<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CLRG - Community Law Resource Group &#187; Letters to Parliament</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clrg.info/category/letters-to-parliament/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clrg.info</link>
	<description>Know your rights using Common Law and the Australian Constitution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:56:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>VEC Letter &#8211; Victoria has had only one referendum in 1956</title>
		<link>http://www.clrg.info/2011/11/vec-letter-victoria-has-had-only-one-referendum-in-1956/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clrg.info/2011/11/vec-letter-victoria-has-had-only-one-referendum-in-1956/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CLRG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australian Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letters to Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Referendums]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clrg.info/?p=589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VEC Letter &#8211; Victoria has had only one referendum in 1956 (PDF) &#160;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clrg.info/2011/11/vec-letter-victoria-has-had-only-one-referendum-in-1956/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Submission of Darryl O&#8217;Bryan to the Victorian Law Reform Committee</title>
		<link>http://www.clrg.info/2011/02/submission-of-darryl-obryan-to-the-victorian-law-reform-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clrg.info/2011/02/submission-of-darryl-obryan-to-the-victorian-law-reform-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CLRG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters to Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clrg.info/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Submission of Darryl O&#8217;Bryan to the Victorian Law Reform Committee (PDF)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clrg.info/2011/02/submission-of-darryl-obryan-to-the-victorian-law-reform-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Validity of Bill of Rights 1688</title>
		<link>http://www.clrg.info/2011/02/validity-of-bill-of-rights-1688/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clrg.info/2011/02/validity-of-bill-of-rights-1688/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CLRG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australian Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imperial Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letters to Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clrg.info/?p=401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clrg.info/2011/02/validity-of-bill-of-rights-1688/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Validity of Imperial Acts Application Act 1980</title>
		<link>http://www.clrg.info/2011/02/validity-of-imperial-acts-application-act-1980/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clrg.info/2011/02/validity-of-imperial-acts-application-act-1980/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CLRG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australian Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letters to Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clrg.info/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clrg.info/2011/02/validity-of-imperial-acts-application-act-1980/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter questioning authority to enact GST</title>
		<link>http://www.clrg.info/2011/02/letter-questioning-authority-to-enact-gst/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clrg.info/2011/02/letter-questioning-authority-to-enact-gst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CLRG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters to Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clrg.info/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Letter questioning authority to enact GST (PDF)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clrg.info/2011/02/letter-questioning-authority-to-enact-gst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Tax Office &#8220;not a legal entity&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.clrg.info/2010/08/australian-tax-office-not-a-legal-entity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clrg.info/2010/08/australian-tax-office-not-a-legal-entity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CLRG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Did You Know ?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letters to Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clrg.info/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All of the below infomation is unedited and was saved from www.brumbywatchaustralia.com/Principality01.htm (no longer live). The Principality of Range View Is the illegal ATO above the purported law &#8211; obviously the purported Tax Commissioner thinks it is. &#8230; Another example of the tyranny in Australia. Below: Mr S. Cantrill of the illegal ATO confirms that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clrg.info/2010/08/australian-tax-office-not-a-legal-entity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney General confirms Local Councils are not Constitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.clrg.info/2010/07/attorney-general-confirms-local-councils-are-not-constitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clrg.info/2010/07/attorney-general-confirms-local-councils-are-not-constitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CLRG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters to Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clrg.info/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click on the image below to view the Attorney General&#8217;s response to a letter regarding the 1988 referendum and local councils not being recognised by The Constitution.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clrg.info/2010/07/attorney-general-confirms-local-councils-are-not-constitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court to handle Commonwealth&#8217;s defence</title>
		<link>http://www.clrg.info/2009/05/high-court-to-handle-commonwealths-defence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clrg.info/2009/05/high-court-to-handle-commonwealths-defence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CLRG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters to Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clrg.info/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clrg.info/2009/05/high-court-to-handle-commonwealths-defence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victorian Constitution Bill 1854, without the Queen&#8217;s Assent ?</title>
		<link>http://www.clrg.info/2009/05/victorian-constitution-bill-1854-without-the-queens-assent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clrg.info/2009/05/victorian-constitution-bill-1854-without-the-queens-assent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CLRG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters to Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clrg.info/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click on the image below to view a larger copy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clrg.info/2009/05/victorian-constitution-bill-1854-without-the-queens-assent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Governor General&#8217;s &#8216;titular&#8217; role as &#8220;Commander In Chief&#8221; of the Australian Defence Force.</title>
		<link>http://www.clrg.info/2009/05/governor-generals-titular-role-as-commander-in-chief-of-the-australian-defence-force/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clrg.info/2009/05/governor-generals-titular-role-as-commander-in-chief-of-the-australian-defence-force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CLRG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters to Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clrg.info/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tit-u-lar - adjective 1.     existing or being such in title only; nominal; having the title but none of the associated duties, powers, etc.: the titular head of the company. 2.     from whom or which a title or name is taken: His titular Saint is Michael. 3.     of, pertaining to, or of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clrg.info/2009/05/governor-generals-titular-role-as-commander-in-chief-of-the-australian-defence-force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

