Wayne Glew on your rights and the Australian Constitution

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 8.2/10 (19 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +12 (from 14 votes)
Wayne Glew on your rights and the Australian Constitution, 8.2 out of 10 based on 19 ratings

This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 23rd, 2011 at 1:19 am and is filed under Constitution, Videos. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


8 Comments - “Wayne Glew on your rights and the Australian Constitution”

  1. StueeDee Says:

    Immensely grateful for you imparting the ‘TrutH’ to the masses. How can we get more coverage for this. I’ve posted in on my fb page.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. Manuel Moleirinho Says:

    Hi,
    Do you hold meettings in Prth,if so whre and when.

    Thankyou
    Regards
    Manuel

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. CLRG Says:

    Hi Manuel,

    Sorry, at this stage we only hold meetings in Victoria.

    There are some recorded videos of some meetings in the CLRG Videos section.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. Jason Servos Says:

    Hi Im having trouble trying to ascertain the truth or significance of the “train of thought” that sugests the Constitution is invalid due to Queen Victoria not giving this super important document the roayal ascention ? (signature) any help where I can prove this to be incorect or a non issue would be greatly apreciated thankyou

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. CLRG Says:

    I heard a comment from someone recently that stated the Queen was allegedly legally blind at the time the Constitution was signed, which would therefore make the document void. I think there is another theory floating about that claims it’s invalid for other reasons, though I cannot verify any of these claims without further research.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. Cayne Says:

    Hi there I’m wondering on where about’s is there any classes in Victoria that gives information on the Constitution that’s close to my home town of Ballarat. hope i get a fast response from you cheers. Or where i can buy the Book so i can learn about it of the state and Federal Constitution..

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  7. Dave Says:

    Wayne – you have (at last) been declared a vexatious litigant in WA… will you finally stop clogging the courts with your nonsense?
    Yeah – what’s the chance this is published…?
    Smarter people than you have explained the flaws in your argument – and they have done so carefully and respectfully… but you continue your fucked-up crusade.
    Take a “chill pill” Wayne – you are wrong and so are your sad followers. Yes guys – wrong, wrong, wrong. $100 bucks says you’re wrong – wait… I win. That’s been established!
    Wayne – you are simply a misguided prat in the machinery of justice.. Stop being that prat. Please.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
  8. Alison John Says:

    Dave, would you please explain and give reference to which people have highlighted the flaws in Wayne’s arguments?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Post a comment

All comments are moderated before being published on the site.